ARRL Hudson Division February 2002Hudson Division Beacon - e-mail editionBy Frank Fallon, N2FF, Director, Hudson Division, ARRL30 East Williston Avenue, East Williston, NY 11596(516) 746-7652 n2ff@arrl.org Hudson Division Home Page - http://www.hudson.arrl.org ARRL Members Please continue to spread the word to others who may want to receive thisinformation that they will need to access the ARRL members only web site andafter becoming a member they must edit their profile and elect to receivebulletins from the Section Manager and Director. > DALLAS ARRL BOARD MEETING Here is a highly edited summary of the January Board meeting minutes withsome comments. The Board of Directors of the American Radio Relay League, Inc., met inannual session at the DFW Airport Marriott South, in Ft. Worth, Texas, onFriday, January 18, and Saturday, January 19, 2002. The meeting was calledto order at 8:36 AM CST, January 18, with President Jim Haynie, W5JBP, inthe Chair. 2. On motion of Mr. Maxwell, seconded by the entire Board, the followingresolution was ADOPTED and read aloud by President Haynie: WHEREAS, the United States suffered unparalleled acts of war duringthe attacks occurring on September 11, 2001; and WHEREAS, Radio Amateurs were among those whose lives were lost onthat day; and WHEREAS, numerous Radio Amateurs were among those who participatedin the rescue and recovery efforts on September 11, 2001, and thereafter;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the American Radio Relay League Boardof Directors extends the organization's most sincere condolences to thefamilies and friends of the Radio Amateurs who lost their lives on September11, 2001. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the American Radio Relay LeagueBoard of Directors commends and honors all the Amateur Radio operators whogenerously volunteered their time and expertise during the rescue andrecovery efforts on September 11 and thereafter.3. The assembly observed a moment of silence in recollection of RadioAmateurs who have passed away since the previous Board meeting, includingthe following from the Hudson Division: Robert D. Cirri Sr., KA2OTD; Gerard J. "Rod" Coppola, KA2KET; Winston A.Grant, KA2DRF; Steven A. Jacobson, N2SJ; Bill James, WA2QHL; CraigMellinger, N2MNA; Lyndell C. "Chuck" Miller, WA0KUH; Dave Nicholson, KD4NYC;J. Dawson Ransome, W2SAI; William V. Steckman, WA2ACW; and George Veraldo,WB2BAU. 7. Mr. Frenaye reported on the activities of the ARRL Foundation,and reported that the Foundation has assets totaling $2.15 million. Hethanked the ARRL for the excellent support of the staff, particularly ARRLFoundation Secretary Mary Lau, N1VH. It is my privilege to serve on the ARRL Foundation for a second year. 11. The Chair opened nominations for the office of an additionalVice President. Mr. Bodson nominated Mr. Kanode. Mr. Goddard nominated Mr.Fried Heyn, WA6WZO. On motion of Mr. Butler, seconded by Mr. Fallon, it wasVOTED to close nominations. At this point, the Chair appointed Mr. Stafford,Mr. Frahm, and Mr. Huntington as Tellers. The Tellers found 8 votes for Mr.Heyn, and 7 votes for Mr. Kanode, whereupon the Chair declared Mr. Heynelected as an additional Vice President. (Applause). 20. The Chair opened nominations for Director members of theExecutive Committee for one-year terms. Mr. Bodson nominated Mr. Butler. Mr.Day nominated Mr. Roderick. Mr. Frenaye nominated Mr. Fallon. Mr. Bellowsnominated Mr. Frenaye. On motion of Mr. Race, seconded by Mr. Goddard, itwas VOTED to close nominations, whereupon the Chair declared Mr. Butler, Mr.Roderick, Mr. Fallon, and Mr. Frenaye elected as Executive Committeemembers. (Applause). This will mark my fourth year on the Executive Committee. Discussion ensued until the Board recessed at 5:18 PM. The Board wasin recess until 8:35 AM on January 19, reconvening with all persons hereinbefore mentioned. 35. On motion of Mrs. Craigie, seconded by Mr. Walstrom, itwas unanimously VOTED that the following resolution is adopted. WHEREAS, Amateur Radio's emergency communications capability ranksfirst among the bases and purposes of the service set forth in the FCC'sRules; and WHEREAS, non-emergency public service communications events aretraining experiences which prepare Amateurs for service in both natural andman-made disasters; and WHEREAS, since the founding of our League, the ARRL has sponsoredprograms which train, organize, and enable Amateur Radio volunteers toprovide emergency communications support to charitable agencies andgovernment authorities; and WHEREAS, in these challenging times not only for our country butalso for the entire civilized world, it is essential for Amateur Radio tooffer the most efficient and effective emergency communications systems,including support for Homeland Security; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the ARRL's Volunteer ResourcesCommittee is directed to perform an in-depth study of the League's programsrelated to emergency communications and non-emergency public servicecommunications, and to report recommendations for modernizing, streamlining,and increasing the effectiveness of these programs to the Board at theAnnual Meeting in January, 2003. If you have any input on this issue, please let me know ASAP. 39. Mr. Stinson, as Chairman, presented his detailed written andvisual report on the activities and recommendations of the Administrationand Finance Committee. He observed that while traditional revenues andexpenses are roughly flat over the last few years, the Board has directedthe ARRL into an aggressive and expensive agenda that will requirere-evaluation of priorities. 40. On motion of Mr. Stinson, seconded by Mr. Bodson, it wasunanimously VOTED that League management is authorized to establish the pagecount of QST. The Board was in recess for luncheon from 12:02 PM until 12:52PM, reconvening with all persons hereinbefore mentioned. 41. On motion of Mr. Stinson, seconded by Mr. Isely, it was MOVEDthat the 2002 budget submission is approved. On motion of Mr. Bellows,seconded by Mr. Maxwell, it was VOTED to amend the motion by adding thefollowing resolution: WHEREAS, the ARRL management and ARRL Board of Directors arecommitted to effectively and efficiently providing information of interestto all ARRL members; and WHEREAS, the two primary means of providing information to membersare QST magazine and the ARRL Web site; and WHEREAS, ARRL management and the ARRL Administration & FinanceCommittee have proposed moving Section News and Contest Result line scoresto the enhanced ARRL Web site in an effort to reduce ARRL operating losseswhile still affording a means of providing that information to ARRL members;andWHEREAS, prior to deciding to relocate QST content from QST to the Web siteit is desirable that members are aware of the reasons for the proposedrelocation and the enhanced capabilities available on the Web site; andWHEREAS, deferring the decision to relocate QST content will afford anopportunity to better understand the effect of such an action andinvestigate how best to provide this information and expanded content tomembers while being mindful of our fiscal responsibilities; andWHEREAS, deferring the decision to relocate Section News and Contest Resultline scores will afford an opportunity to evaluate variations andalternatives to the proposal.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the determination of whether torelocate Section News and Contest Line scores from QST to the ARRL Web shallbe deferred until the July, 2002 Board meeting. The question then being on the motion as amended, the same wasADOPTED. This means that we have postponed a final decision on the implementationuntil the July meeting. Please take a look at the information available toSection Managers on the ARRL web page. Some of them have already begun touse pictures. Contesters should check http://www.arrl.org/contests/soapboxfor information now available about the ARRL CW 2002 which took place thispast weekend. While still in development it is pretty timely and will giveyou an idea of the possibilities now available. Additionally an enhancedsearchable listing of line by line contest scores is under development. 44. On motion of Mr. Harrison, seconded by Mr. Fallon, it wasunanimously VOTED that the following resolution is adopted. WHEREAS, the Spectrum Strategy Committee (Stratcom) has initiated animportant process in evaluating the impact of Part 15 and other devicesoperating in the Amateur Radio Service; and WHEREAS, the remaining objectives of Stratcom are shared with theRFI Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that the remaining objectives andrecommendations of Stratcom be transferred to the RFI Task Force. The RFITask Force shall be renamed the Electromagnetic Compatibility Committee (EMCCommittee). The current members of the RFI Task Force shall be appointed tothe EMC Committee and additional members appointed by the President asnecessary. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Spectrum Strategy Committee isdischarged with thanks. 50. On motion of Mr. Fallon, seconded by Mr. Bodson, it wasunanimously VOTED that, as recommended by the Public Relations Committee,Mr. Michaelangelo Conte is selected to receive the "2001 Bill Leonard W2SKEProfessional Media Award." (Applause). I will be very pleased to make this presentation in mid March. 56. At this point, the President announced the committeeappointments as follows: Administration and Finance: Directors Bellows,Chairman; Stinson, Fuller, Day, Isely, Vice Director Fenstermaker, VicePresident Harrison, and Treasurer McCobb. Membership Services: DirectorsGoddard, Chairman; Bodson, Fallon, Milnes, Frenaye, Vice Director Frahm, andVice President Stafford. Volunteer Resources: Directors Maxwell, Chairman;Race, Walstrom, Butler, Vice Director Edgar, and Vice Presidents Craigie andHeyn. Election: Directors Stinson, Chairman; Goddard, and Fallon. IndustryAdvisory Council: Director Goddard, Chairman. RFI Task Force: DirectorBodson, Chairman. Public Relations: Diane Ortiz, K2DO, Chairman; ViceDirector Johnston, Rich Moseson, W2VU; Jeff Reinhardt, AA6JR; Jim McDonald,KB9LEI; Phyllisan West, KA4FZI; Gary Pearce, KN4AQ; Tom Webb, WA9AFM; andBob Josuweit, WA3PZO. RF Safety: Vice Director Huntington, Liaison.SAREX/ARISS: Roy Neal, K6DUE, Frank Bauer, KA3HDO, and Vice PresidentHarrison. Technology Task Force: Vice Directors Huntington, Chairman,Raisbeck, and Director Frenaye. Historical: Directors Frenaye, Chairman,Maxwell, Treasurer McCobb, and Al Cohen, W1FXQ. Antenna Defense: DirectorsBellows, Chairman; Fallon, Counsel Imlay, and Jim O'Connell, W9WU. The news here is that in addition to being elected to the ExecutiveCommittee for a fourth year running I am also on Membership Services,Elections, and Antenna Defense. I am no longer the Chairman of MembershipServices and I am happy about that as it was taking a great deal of my timethat I really wanted to devote to lobbying efforts and legislation.Normally directors on the Executive Committee do not also chair a standingcommittee as I did last year. Steve will most likely be put on one of thead-hoc committees that President Haynie will form later in the year. 61. Mr. Stafford, as Chairman, presented the report of the NoviceSpectrum Study Committee. The Committee's report included itsrecommendations and a sampling of comments from some of the 4744 respondentsto a survey placed on the ARRL Web site and in QST. On motion of Mr.Stafford, seconded by Mr. Race, it was MOVED that the following resolutionbe adopted. WHEREAS, the FCC in a 1999 Report and Order stated it would nolonger issue Novice Class Amateur Radio Licenses after April 15, 2000; and WHEREAS, at Minute 66 of the January, 2001 Annual Meeting thePresident was authorized to appoint a committee to study the issue of"re-farming" the Novice bands through solicitation of input from the AmateurRadio community; and WHEREAS, the Committee, using QST and the ARRL Website, sought inputfrom the entire Amateur Radio community; and WHEREAS, the committee received input from approximately 5000amateurs on this issue; and WHEREAS, a large majority of responses indicated a preference forexpansion of the phone bands. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the ARRL Executive VicePresident and Counsel are instructed to file a petition containing thefollowing request for changes in the phone, CW, and digital and image modeportions of the following bands:1. 80 Meters phone, image, CW: General Class 3800 to 4000 kHz Advanced Class 3725 to 4000 kHz Extra Class 3700 to 4000 kHz 2. 40 Meters phone, image, CW: General Class 7175 to 7300 kHz Advanced Class 7125 to 7300 kHz Extra Class 7125 to 7300 kHz 3. 15 Meters phone, image, CW: General Class 21250 to 21450 kHz Advanced Class 21200 to 21450 kHz Extra Class 21175 to 21450 kHzIT IS FURTHER MOVED that the CW only portion of the following bands,available to Novice Class and Technician Plus Class licensees, be amended asset out below: 80 Meters 3525 to 3700 kHz 40 Meters 7025 to 7125 kHz 15 Meters 21025 to 21175 kHzAND FURTHER MOVED that the CW, RTTY and data band available to Novice andTechnician Plus licensees of 28100 to 28300 kHz be expanded to 28000 to28300 kHz; AND FURTHER MOVED that Novice and Technician Plus licensees shall be limitedto 200 watts output power when operating CW or digital modes within theseexpanded band segments. Section 97.313 (C) (1) shall be amended so as toapply only to the 10100 - 10150 kHz band.On motion of Mr. Roderick, seconded by Mr. Walstrom, it was VOTED to amendthe parts of the resolution regarding 80 Meters and 15 Meters to read:1. 80 Meters phone, image, CW: General Class 3800 to 4000 kHz Advanced Class 3750 to 4000 kHz Extra Class 3725 to 4000 kHz 3. 15 Meters phone, image, CW: General Class 21275 to 21450 kHz Advanced Class 21225 to 21450 kHz Extra Class 21200 to 21450 kHzAnd CW for Novice and Technician Plus licensees, 3525 to 3725 kHz and 21025to 21200 kHz.The question then being on the amended motion, it was unanimously VOTED toadopt same. I did not vote for the amendment as it did not move the phone and imagefrequencies low enough into the band. The Novice Survey indicated thatmembers wanted the band to be lower. The amendment did not follow theresults of the survey. There may now well be problems convincing the FCC todo it this way as they have repeatedly told us that we should have consensusin the amateur community before we make any requests for changes to Part 97. 62. At this point the Board considered Directors' motions.64. On motion of Mr. Fallon, seconded by Mr. Bodson, it was MOVED that thefollowing resolution be adopted:WHEREAS, it is important to advertise Amateur Radio when responding todisasters and while communicating at special events;NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MOVED that staff be tasked with designing anddeveloping a distinctive garment similar to that used by Red Crossvolunteers, which can be sold by ARRL to our ARES volunteers and worn bythem when responding. Mr. Butler moved, seconded by Mr. Day, that the matter be referred to stafffor study, but the motion failed. On motion of Mr. Day, seconded by Mr.Stinson, it was unanimously VOTED to refer the matter to the VolunteerResources Committee for study. It was a bit confusing. Here is an example of a committee that wants to beinvolved. There was not sufficient time to run this idea through thecommittee before the meeting and the director members of the committeewanted to be involved and now they are. Most board members feel that any newidea should work its way through a committee. Here is an example of thatthinking. What I saw after 9/11 was our ARES volunteers responding in greatnumbers but getting lost in a sea of Red Cross uniforms. Our operators wereeither in civilian clothes or wore the Red Cross vest. When a mediarepresentative arrived on the scene we were thought to be Red Cross radiooperators and our ARES/RACES story did not get covered. We need to changethat fast. We need a distinctive garment identifying us and helping to tellour Amateur Radio story. I hope that before 2002 ends we will havedeveloped this garment. 67. On motion of Mr. Isely, seconded by Mr. Harrison, it was VOTEDthat "Moved and Seconded" be moved from QST but be published on the ARRL Weband other media. The staff wanted to have us go on record here on this change. With therecent flap about moving "Section News" to QST we felt we needed to showthat director egos were not involved in forcing members to read about ouractions at two Board meeting a year. It takes up a lot of pages and formany the type is painfully small which may cut down on the number ofreaders. It is better moved to the Web site at this time. Those interestedin the activities of the Board and the Executive Committee minutes willstill be able to read them, but it will be on-line. 68. On motion of Mr. Maxwell, seconded by Mr. Milnes, it was VOTEDthat the MSC study a digital bandplan for the 40 Meter band, anticipatingfavorable FCC response to the ARRL Spectrum Refarming proposal. For those of you who, like me, use digital modes on 40 Meters, you mayrealize that this is currently impossible if you want to work DX. As thetwo thirds of the world who have only one hundred kilohertz use the segmentaround 7030 to 7050 for digital modes and the US and Canadian gang use 7070to 7100 a band plan is not practical. Few Europeans will move up above 7050to work RTTY as this is voice territory. All heck therefore breaks loose ina RTTY contest as it did a two weeks ago during the CQ/RJ WPX RTTY Contest.There were RTTY stations on from 7025 to 7050 and also at 7075 to 7090. Allthis on Saturday evening during the NA Sprint CW contest. I am sure thatsome regular 40 Meter cw operators thought a war had started when they heardall the RTTY stations invade the band. It was wild for a few hours. Butthe bottom line is that we will not be able to devise a "digital bandplanfor the 40 Meter band" until after WRC 2003 and the adoption of astandardized world wide band plan. I have my fingers crossed this doeshappen. Until then this is an idea before its time. I did not vote for thismotion and spoke against it as impractical and not timely. 70. There being no further business, those present were invited to makeinformal closing comments and the meeting was adjourned at 5:23 PM. (Time insession as a Board: 13 hours, 51 minutes). In all we had three full days of meetings. By the time Steve and I flewhome HRU 2002 was over. > ARRL ASKS FCC TO DROP RFID RULES PROPOSED FOR 425-435 MHz Perhaps you have seen ARLB013 and wondered what is going on. One local clubnewsletter has been carrying the story and I am not sure all our members aregetting it right. There are two things at issue here. One is a seriousthreat to the 440 band and the other is a BIG increase in the threat of Part15 devices. Part 15 is the FCC rules which allow unlicensed low power shortduration devices to share our bands. The thinking is that there will be fewof them and they will not cause us interference as they are very low powerdevices. Many of them have been there for years, but now here is a realthreat. What the FCC is proposing here is a CHANGE in the Part 15regulations as we know them. In this case the power level proposed ishigher than currently allowed by law and it's a LONG duration device. Thesedevices are going to be permitted to transmit for two minutes and then turnoff for ten seconds. That's about as close to constant on as is possible.It sets a very bad precedent for future Part 15 devices, which areincreasingly used in many of our bands. The real problem is that since thedevices are unlicensed, should they be found to cause interference, there isno way to trace them and recall them. It's a bit like unleashing whatpromises to be a hoard of undocumented alien transmitters in the 440 band. If the FCC insists on doing this we feel they should be licensed so they canbe traced. We are almost certain that in some cases there will be aproblem. ARRL's approach and continued action on this matter will be on the agenda atthe March 2nd ARRL Executive Committee meeting I will attend In Washington. Here is the text of the bulletin: The ARRL says the FCC ''cannot legally proceed with the rules proposed forunlicensed RFID tags at 433 MHz,'' and it's asked the Commission to notadopt them. The League filed comments February 12 as part of its continuedopposition to what it called ''this ill-conceived proposal'' of SAVITechnology to deploy unlicensed transient RF identification devices between425 and 435 MHz at much higher field strengths and duty cycles than Part 15rules now permit for such devices. The FCC appears inclined to agree withSAVI's proposal, but FCC staff members have told the ARRL that it's not a''done deal.'' ''The level of interference from the devices permitted under the proposedrule is intolerable,'' the ARRL argued, citing its own interference study.The League reiterated its stance that the Communications Act of 1934 ''isdevoid of any authority to allow unlicensed devices with substantialinterference potential; suchdevices must be licensed.'' SAVI, the ARRL argues in its comments, ''wants to have its cake and eat ittoo'' by getting high power levels and lengthy duty cycles operating on aband heavily used by a licensed radio service that uses sensitive receivers''and all of the above on an unlicensed basis.'' Among other applications,RFID tags are used to track and inventory parcel shipments and vehicles. The ARRL said the FCC's inclination to go along with SAVI Technology'sproposal ''eviscerates the periodic radiator rules, is vague andoverbroad,'' and would permit digital RFIDs to operate ''atunsuitable power levels and duty cycles.'' The result would be unacceptableinterference that would ''preclude or repeatedly disrupt amateuroperation,'' the ARRL said. The ARRL also said that the cost of the tags is a problem for SAVI, and thechoice of frequency band is related only to the cost of components. TheLeague said SAVI chose 433.9 MHz as an operatingfrequency because of the availability of relatively cheap components inEurope, where the 433.05-434.79 MHz band is available for industrial,scientific and medical uses in at least 10 countries. Given the global direction in this technology, the ARRL pointed out,deploying the proposed RFID tags elsewhere would make much better sense.''SAVI should seriously consider the frequencies around 868 or915 MHz, which apparently stand at least some reasonable chance of globalstandardization,'' the ARRL advised. The RFID rules proposed in response to SAVI's Petition for Rule Making lastyear ''are flawed from their inception and should not be adopted under anycircumstances,'' the League concluded. The ARRL hassaid it will ''do whatever it takes'' to keep the FCC from permitting theRFID tags on 70 cm. That could include further direct appeals to FCCstaffers, Imlay has said. The FCC included the Part 15 RFID proposals within a larger proceeding,ET-01-278, that's aimed primarily at reviewing and updating portions of itsPart 2, 15 and 18 rules. ARRL's comments in the proceeding are available onthe ARRL Web site http://www.arrl.org/announce/regulatory/savi/arrl-savicmts-0.html.Reply comments are due by March 12, 2002. If you are a heavy user of 440 you may want to comment to FCC. We canalways use support. > METROCOR UPDATE Effective January 17th 2002, Stephan Anderman resigned as President ofMetroCor. In his place, Larry Lutzak/WA2CNV has assumed the Presidency ofMetroCor, Inc. Larry's association with amateur radio dates back to 1967. MetroCor is an organization born out of a need to replace the defunct TSARCorganization. After a great deal of work and effort, MetroCor, Inc. was bornin July 2000. Over the last several weeks, MetroCor has been in "proactive"mode. The 'number one priority" according to Larry has been the annualfiling of an updated amateur radio coordinated database with the ARRL.MetroCor is painstakingly working to verify the old TSARC records with theaid of many volunteers in the Hudson Division. Larry's findings thus farindicate that, "In many respects, the old TSARC dB continues to berepresentative of a large segment of active repeaters that have been aroundsince the early 1980s'." Larry now feels that MetroCor is beginning to function as all in theaffected area had first hoped. He adds "with the talent pool available inthe MetroCor area, everything is possible. MetroCor is very much alive andfunctioning and thanks to a host of help and support, we've moved wellbeyond the point of saddling the ARRL with outdated information. The ARRLwill now have an updated dB, without using data sources from outside theMetroCor area." In a telephone conversation with ARCC's Vice President Gene Pressler/W3ZXV,Larry stated that Gene reiterated ARCC's offer of assistance, to furtherMetroCor's mission of coordination for the MetroCor area. As President of MetroCor, I thank everyone who wishes to assist and supportMetroCor in achieving a level of service akin to its neighbor councils. Larry Lutzak/WA2CNVPresident - MetroCor, Inc. This is a very positive development. I have asked Vice Director, SteveMendelsohn, W2ML who was formerly President of TSARC, to contact arearepeater owners to let them know about this promising development. It'stime to get behind the "new" MetroCor and make sure we again have afunctioning coordinating body in the metro NYC area. Larry assures me thatthe "new" MetroCor will provide an updated listing for the 2002 ARRLRepeater Handbook, which will go into production shortly. There will bechanges this year. Check http://ww.qsl.net/metrocor > NEW YORK TOWER BILL STATUS.... This is year three for our antenna support structure bill in New York State.Currently all bills not passed by the end of 2001 were sent back to theiroriginating committees. That means that our bills have gone back to theLocal Government Committee in both the Senate and the Assembly. This is nota setback. All of last year's bills, which were not passed, suffered asimilar fate. It's simply the way the legislature operates. We hope to movethem along as fast as possible. Just last Wednesday, February 13th, three of us made a lobbying trip toAlbany. I picked up Gerry Agliata, W2GLA, in New Rochelle and we drove toAlbany where we met Ray Wempel, KA2DVM. It was a freezing cold day withtemperatures down around 24 degrees and winds that made the windchill about 6 degrees. I mention this because we could not park in theunderground visitors parking area as usual and had to find a parking garageabout three blocks away. I had on only a sports jacket as I did notenvision parking outside. So much for emergency preparedness! After I warmed up we had a very productive meeting in Senator Farley'soffice which was arranged by his aide, Dave Smingler. Farley is the deputywhip. Dave who has been friendly to our cause from day one arranged forWaynette Engel, Director of Legislative Operation for our senate sponsor,Senator Volker, to be there. Also in attendance were Peter Rupert andanother assistant from Senator Bruno's office. Bruno is the Majority Leaderand nothing happens in Albany without his approval. We therefore had somevery important people at the meeting. We met for almost an hour. Wedistributed a PR package that Jennifer Hagy had sent down which included acopy of the November QST with the 9/11 story and some local news storiesabout Amateur Radio and ARES. It's a very professional package. We madeout pitch for the bill stressing the need for a state standard which willprotect us from local government which all too frequently does notunderstand PRB-1, the federal limited preemption. We pointed out that localgovernment looks to the state for guidelines rather the remote federalgovernment. When we spoke about the recent federal decision involvingSaratoga Springs we discovered that Peter Rupert was a resident. Weexplained that at the moment there were was no limited federal preemptionprotection for property which had CC&Rs. (We did not tell him that ARRLwould like to change that.) Rupert lives in a gated community with CC&Rs.We distributed copies of the Saratoga decision which I had fortunatelybrought along just in case. I stressed the point that the judge felt thetown made the ham involved jump through too many hoops and did not negotiatein good faith. Here was another good reason to pass the New York bill.They appeared to understand the need for the bill and we answered the fewquestions they had. We took the time also to explain that there was nofinancial impact to local government pointing out that while there was asection in the bill which protected us from local assessments for thesupport structure which are temporary in nature. We pointed out that thesupport structure moves with the ham and is not like a garage or a pool,which adds value to the home. Before the meeting ended Ms. Engel announcedto all the Senator Volker was pushing for passage this year. It wasimportant that Bruno's aides hear this. We came away with a very goodfeeling about progress this year. On the way back to Assemblyman Tocci's office we spotted the office ofSenator Mary Lou Rath who heads the senate Local Government Committee, whereour bill currently resides, and decided to stop in and see if we could talkto someone. We were very lucky here. While the senator was not in, thelegislature is not in session for the next two weeks, we were able to meetwith Carol Cybulski who is Rath's Director of Operation and Legislation. Wegave her the same PR package and had a lengthy discussion of emergencycommunications after we discovered that Senator Rath is the new head of aDisaster Preparedness Committee and is dealing with implementation of astatewide emergency communications system. All three of us pointed out thatthe system would take more than ten years to bring on line unless the statepreempted local government and made it impossible to block towerconstruction. We spoke in detail about the opposition our bill hadencountered from the Adirondack Park Association and the problemsencountered with local government in understanding the limited federalpreemption. She appreciated our comments and input as this was a newresponsibility for her and her senator. In all we had two very productive sessions. We are planning another trip toAlbany next month. I believe that this year ARRL members should have personal conversationswith their representatives and stress the need for passage this year of A.1565 and S. 2893. We need to remind the legislators that very frequentlythe net control stations in the aftermath of the 9/11 attack were operatingfrom home rather than from an EOC or a Red Cross HQ. If these home stationshad no outside antennas or nice high support structures such operation wouldnot have been possible. > NEW FEDERAL TOWER CASE IN WESTERN NEW YORK Atlantic Division Director Bernie Fuller, who has been working with us inthe effort to get a New York State tower bill, recently forwarded thefollowing e-mail to me. Remember New York and New Jersey has since 1925been shared by two divisions - Hudson and Atlantic. Please take the messagebelow as another indication as to why we need passage of S.2893 and A. 1565. --Alan Paul, KC2GZY, is suing the Village of East Aurora, NY in FederalCourt in the Western District of NY. A building permit for a tower was denied, based on an absoluteprohibition against towers in Village residential zones. The zoning boarddenied his appeal, based on the zoning ordinance with only apassing reference to federal law cited by KC2GZY in both his building permitapplication and request for appeal. Mr. Paul was represented by attorney Denis J. Uminski, N2HP, inpreparing the building permit application and presenting the appeal. Alsopresent at the appeal hearing was attorney Peter Vasilion, KB2NMV, whooffered his expertise and moral support. Local attorney Glenn Murray hasbeen retained to represent Alan in federal court. KC2GZY is being forced to spend thousands of dollars in legal feesbecause PRB-1 has still not been written into New York State law, despitethe ongoing efforts of his State Senator, Dale Volker. Denis J. Uminski, Esq., N2HP > RACING THE CLOCK-AND A SNOWSTORM When the Technical Committee of the 10-70 Repeater Association(Bergen-Passaic Counties) arrived at the Repeater site, to install a new"machine", on the morning of January 19, they knew they had a full day'swork ahead of them. With dire predictions of the season's first significantsnowstorm, they wanted to exit the remote location and be able to turn theW2PQG repeater over to the local SkyWarn team, as expeditiously as possible. With the temperature hovering in the icy 20's, Howie, WB2AWQ;Pat, WA2PFS; George, KC2GLG, Bill, KC2BLN; and Paul, KC2CJW carted thepre-assembled and pre-programmed components to the recently cleaned-outradio shack. "We improvised as we went along, and when we hit a snag, weliterally went back to the drawing board" commented Paul Beshlian. The equipment had functioned flawlessly, during the trial runs,but when everything was in place, a severe desensing problem developed.Fortunately, the "tech gang" had a back-up strategy, whichwas pressed into service, but as the afternoon dragged on, the inevitable"little gremlins" appeared, as did the encroaching snow. The route leading to the repeater site was shut down by thepolice department and the roads were icy and treacherous. As darkness fell,club members monitored the input for updates on the installationefforts. Some communications shifted to the 145.450 repeater, which is alsoowned and operated by the 10-70 club. At 8:00 PM, the Bergen SkyWarn Net signed on the air, utilizingthe back-up machine. With only six stations checking in, the results were,nonetheless, forwarded to the National Weather Station, at Upton, NY, andthe CBS, NBC, FOX, and ABC local affiliates. Shortly before 10:00 pm, the new repeater was "up and running".When a request went out for a signal report, club members from Bergen,Passaic and Morris Counties enthusiastically replied with "5-9" reports.After a little tweaking of the tones and messages, the new, much-improved10-70 repeater was ready for duty. At 10:30 PM, the New Jersey VHF Traffic Net was called, byPeter, K1VDH /NCS. A heavier than usual QNI of 23 stations checked-in,including: Stew, KB2VVB; Nat, KB2KLH; Missy, K2MIS; Kymm, KY2MMM; Jeff,KC2BRF; Brian, N2BVM; Pat, WA2PFS. Also, Paul, KC2CJW; Bill, KC2BLN;George, KC2GLG; David, K2DBK; Bob, WB2KNS; Herb, N2OPJ; Justin, KC2GIK;Frank, WB2SFN; Bob, N2LYY; Mike, WA2MWT; Sam, KC2GMS; Bill, KC2FYA; Efrem,W2CZ; Mark, KB2UPP; and Lou, N2CYY. At 10:45 PM, the Bergen SkyWarn Net was convened, by David,K2DBK, Deputy SkyWarn Coordinator. 15 stations reported the snowaccumulations throughout Bergen, Passaic and Morris Counties, in New Jersey;and Orange County, in New York. SkyWarn Spotters checking-in included: John, KC2FTT; Ernie,N2URU; Brian, N2BVM; Stew, KB2VVB; Bill, KC2FYA; Justin, KC2GIK; Lou, N2CYY;Bob, N2LYY; Frank, WB2SFN; Missy, K2MIS; Mike, WA2MWT; Herb, N2OPJ; Sam,KC2GMS; and Bill, KC2BLN. George Sabbi summed up the day's activities: "What stood outmost to me, other than the extensive knowledge base and diverse, butwell-matched skill sets of the various members of the team, was the trueteamwork exhibited , not just by the Tech-Committee, but by the club as awhole. This was indeed a shared project!" Submitted by Michael Adams, WA2MWT > ONE DAY EXTRA CLASS LICENSE STUDY COURSE PLANNED One of my favorite songs from the 1950's was Dina Washington's "What aDifference a Day Makes." As a teenager I actually saw her sing it in asmall Brooklyn cabaret, but that's another story. Here is a chance tochange your Amateur Radio privileges in a one-day course. Taking advantageof the one-day course will make a big difference in your ham radio career.Registration is limited. The Long Island Mobile Amateur Radio Club is holding a One-Day Extra ClassLicense Study Course on Sunday, March 24, 2002. The class will be held atLevittown Hall, 201 Levittown Parkway, Hicksville, NY, from 8:30 am to 5 PM.Anyone who is interested in obtaining their Extra Class Amateur RadioLicense is invited to attend. A student must already hold a General Classlicense. There is a $10 fee to offset material costs. Students will be expected to obtain an Extra class study guide (availablefrom the ARRL, Radio Shack or any ham radio publication supplier) and beginreading it. The course will be designed as a one-day "crash" course in Extraclass theory. As such it is intended as a refresher and tune up for thetest. We will have enough instructors to make it interesting and informativebut we don't pretend to be able to teach you ALLof the material in one day. We do promise you will learn something from thecourse, increase your chances of passing the Extra class test and wet yourknowledge for more! As usual, a full Volunteer Examination session will follow the completion ofthe course at about 4 PM. Students may register by sending their name, callsign, address, city, state,zip, phone number and e-mail address and check for $10 made payable to"LIMARC" to LIMARC Extra Class course, PO Box 392, Levittown NY 11756.Contact: George Tranos N2GA at n2ga@limarc.org or 631-286-756 >>>>>>>>> HAMFESTS: The Spring thaw is coming....... Dates Event and Contact Location 24 Feb Long Island Mobile ARC Hicksville, NY 2002 http://www.limarc.org Contact: Richard Rosner, N2STU Sect:NLI 135 Rollstone Avenue West Sayville, NY 11796 Phone: 631-563-1859 Email: hamfest@limarc.org 2 Mar Splitrock ARA Parsippany,NJ 2002 http://www.splitrockara.org Contact: Maria Turner, KB2VKP Sect:NNJ PO Box 610 Rockaway, NJ 07866 Phone: 888-511-SARA Email: hamfest@splitrockara.org 16 Mar Cherryville Repeater Association Annandale, NJ 2002 http://www.qsl.net/w2cra Contact:Peter Sneed, K2YSY Sect:NNJ 349 Three Bridges Road Flemington, NJ 08822 Phone: 908-788-4080 or 908-369-5095 Email: k2ysy@arrl.net